MCHN vs NU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHN is a Hold and NU is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MCHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
MCHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -47.59% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
NU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| MCHN | NU | MCHN / NU | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 56.3B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -47.368 | 68.788 | -69% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 55.73 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 4.91B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.12B | - |
| NU | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
MCHN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHN and BKEAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHN and BKEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHN | 100% | N/A | ||
| BKEAF - MCHN | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NFBK - MCHN | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCBX - MCHN | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| NU - MCHN | 3% Poorly correlated | -7.44% | ||
| NSTS - MCHN | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||