Ad is loading...
MCIFX vs PACIX
MCIFX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts MCIFX vs PACIX
Miller Convertible Bond I
Price$12.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets590.66M
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$22.08
Change+$0.31 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
MCIFX vs PACIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCIFX vs. PACIX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCIFX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. MCIFX (591M). MCIFX pays higher dividends than PACIX: MCIFX (4.78) vs PACIX (1.91). MCIFX was incepted earlier than PACIX: MCIFX (17 years) vs PACIX (38 years). PACIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than MCIFX (1.02). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. MCIFX (73.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCIFX: PACIX (2000) vs MCIFX (1000000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. MCIFX (1.11). MCIFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.15 vs. PACIX (11.72).
| MCIFX | PACIX | MCIFX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.08 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.16 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.836 | 0.586 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 591M | 1.11B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 1.91 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 9.67 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.77 | 11.09 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.15 | 11.72 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.96 | 35.07 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...