Ad is loading...
MCOAX vs PCNTX
MCOAX vs PCNTX Comparison
Open Charts MCOAX vs PCNTX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$18.63
Change+$0.19 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
Putnam Convertible Securities R6
Price$25.44
Change+$0.26 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets490.55M
MCOAX vs PCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCOAX vs. PCNTX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCOAX is a Hold and PCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.48B vs. PCNTX (491M). MCOAX pays higher dividends than PCNTX: MCOAX (3.18) vs PCNTX (2.30). MCOAX was incepted earlier than PCNTX: MCOAX (30 years) vs PCNTX (7 years). MCOAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PCNTX (0.72). PCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). PCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: PCNTX (0) vs MCOAX (15000). PCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.20 vs. MCOAX (5.38). MCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.87 vs. PCNTX (14.46).
| MCOAX | PCNTX | MCOAX / PCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.223 | -0.017 | -1,344% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 25000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 491M | 300% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.30 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | 12.20 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 14.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.87 | 14.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.25 | N/A | - |