MCUJF
Price
$0.88
Change
+$0.07 (+8.64%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.29M
MGWFF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCUJF vs MGWFF

Header iconMCUJF vs MGWFF Comparison
Open Charts MCUJF vs MGWFFBanner chart's image
Medicure
Price$0.88
Change+$0.07 (+8.64%)
Volume$3.84K
Capitalization11.29M
Maple Leaf Green World
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization3.19M
MCUJF vs MGWFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCUJF vs. MGWFF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCUJF is a StrongBuy and MGWFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MCUJF: $0.88 vs. MGWFF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: MCUJF and MGWFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCUJF: 506% vs. MGWFF: 7%
Market capitalization -- MCUJF: $11.29M vs. MGWFF: $3.19M
MCUJF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $11.29M. MGWFF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $3.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCUJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGWFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCUJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCUJF is a better buy in the long-term than MGWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCUJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGWFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCUJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MGWFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCUJF is a better buy in the short-term than MGWFF.

Price Growth

MCUJF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +9.46% price change this week, while MGWFF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -24.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +75.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.53% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCUJF($11.3M) has a higher market cap than MGWFF($3.2M). MCUJF YTD gains are higher at: 42.258 vs. MGWFF (-34.123). MCUJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.24M vs. MGWFF (-820.85K). MCUJF has more cash in the bank: 4.93M vs. MGWFF (1.87K). MCUJF has less debt than MGWFF: MCUJF (777K) vs MGWFF (1.39M). MCUJF has higher revenues than MGWFF: MCUJF (23M) vs MGWFF (0).
MCUJFMGWFFMCUJF / MGWFF
Capitalization11.3M3.2M354%
EBITDA3.24M-820.85K-395%
Gain YTD42.258-34.123-124%
P/E Ratio12.53N/A-
Revenue23M0-
Total Cash4.93M1.87K264,182%
Total Debt777K1.39M56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCUJF vs MGWFF: Fundamental Ratings
MCUJF
MGWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCUJF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGWFF (95). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MGWFF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to MGWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MGWFF (95). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to MGWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MGWFF (65). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to MGWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGWFF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCUJFMGWFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QRHC2.170.07
+3.33%
Quest Resource Holding Corp
EIX52.951.53
+2.98%
Edison International
EVAX2.720.01
+0.37%
Evaxion A/S
TMCI5.70-0.09
-1.55%
Treace Medical Concepts
TIGO40.40-2.17
-5.10%
Millicom International Cellular SA

MCUJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCUJF and PAIOF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCUJF and PAIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCUJF
1D Price
Change %
MCUJF100%
N/A
PAIOF - MCUJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVRLF - MCUJF
14%
Poorly correlated
+8.38%
MVMDF - MCUJF
11%
Poorly correlated
+7.06%
MGWFF - MCUJF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDXF - MCUJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

MGWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGWFF and GENPF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGWFF and GENPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGWFF
1D Price
Change %
MGWFF100%
N/A
GENPF - MGWFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCUJF - MGWFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSPHF - MGWFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRMD - MGWFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.47%
MILFF - MGWFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More