MCW vs RGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a Hold and RGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MCW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
RGS (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -9.77% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
RGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-0.89% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| MCW | RGS | MCW / RGS | |
| Capitalization | 2.45B | 17.1M | 14,298% |
| EBITDA | 248M | 22.2M | 1,117% |
| Gain YTD | -0.412 | -8.895 | 5% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 927M | 216M | 429% |
| Total Cash | 19M | 7.15M | 266% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 525M | 336% |
RGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MCW | RGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 90% |
MCW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with BFAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then BFAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCW | 100% | -2.94% | ||
| BFAM - MCW | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| TNL - MCW | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| WW - MCW | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| SCI - MCW | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| LIND - MCW | 32% Poorly correlated | -10.33% | ||
More | ||||
RGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and CSV have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and CSV's prices will move in lockstep.