Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYCX vs RNWHX
MCYCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MCYCX vs RNWHX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl C
Price$11.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.89M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.87
Change-$0.48 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.37B
MCYCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.4B vs. MCYCX (110M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than MCYCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs MCYCX (0.00). MCYCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MCYCX (8 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MCYCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MCYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCYCX: RNWHX (250) vs MCYCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. MCYCX (8.58). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. MCYCX (12.94).
| MCYCX | RNWHX | MCYCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.72 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 0.72 | 342% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.151 | 15.588 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 70.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 9.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.11 | 41.01 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.94 | 27.96 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement