It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONCT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDGL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONCT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MDGL (@Biotechnology) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while ONCT (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.
MDGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
ONCT is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2024.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
MDGL | ONCT | MDGL / ONCT | |
Capitalization | 6.68B | 1.56M | 428,223% |
EBITDA | -502.65M | -35.96M | 1,398% |
Gain YTD | 32.285 | -95.090 | -34% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 76.8M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 999M | 14.6M | 6,842% |
Total Debt | 119M | 191K | 62,304% |
MDGL | ONCT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 29 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ONCT's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDGL (69) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ONCT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDGL’s over the last 12 months.
MDGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for ONCT (100) in the null industry. This means that MDGL’s stock grew significantly faster than ONCT’s over the last 12 months.
MDGL's SMR Rating (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ONCT (98) in the null industry. This means that MDGL’s stock grew similarly to ONCT’s over the last 12 months.
MDGL's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONCT (98) in the null industry. This means that MDGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONCT’s over the last 12 months.
MDGL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ONCT (100) in the null industry. This means that MDGL’s stock grew similarly to ONCT’s over the last 12 months.
MDGL | ONCT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 7 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 28 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago81% | 17 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NVDS | 30.46 | 0.57 | +1.91% |
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF | |||
SPTS | 29.04 | N/A | N/A |
SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
MSVX | 22.37 | N/A | N/A |
LHA Market State Alpha Seeker ETF | |||
USCI | 66.05 | -0.42 | -0.63% |
United States Commodity Index | |||
IHF | 47.81 | -1.01 | -2.06% |
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDGL has been loosely correlated with KANT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDGL jumps, then KANT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDGL | 100% | -1.58% | ||
KANT - MDGL | 62% Loosely correlated | -14.41% | ||
VXRT - MDGL | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
ALXO - MDGL | 56% Loosely correlated | +16.23% | ||
REPL - MDGL | 55% Loosely correlated | -6.09% | ||
ZNTL - MDGL | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONCT has been loosely correlated with FULC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONCT jumps, then FULC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ONCT | 100% | N/A | ||
FULC - ONCT | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
CMND - ONCT | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
ENLV - ONCT | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
MDGL - ONCT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
CDTX - ONCT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
More |