Ad is loading...
MDXBX vs NMDAX
MDXBX vs NMDAX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs NMDAX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond A
Price$9.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.54M
MDXBX vs NMDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. NMDAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and NMDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. NMDAX (244M). NMDAX (3.40) and MDXBX (3.35) have matching dividends . MDXBX was incepted earlier than NMDAX: MDXBX (38 years) vs NMDAX (31 years). NMDAX (0.83) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.70 vs. NMDAX (18.00). MDXBX (2500) and NMDAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.87 vs. NMDAX (-0.08). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 4.46 vs. NMDAX (4.04).
| MDXBX | NMDAX | MDXBX / NMDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.83 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.83 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.873 | -3.134 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 244M | 933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.40 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | -0.08 | -1,057% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.70 | 3.34 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.46 | 4.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.21 | 7.39 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers