Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs PAEMX
MEDBX vs PAEMX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs PAEMX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.42B
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$8.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
MEDBX vs PAEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. PAEMX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and PAEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.42B vs. PAEMX (2.19B). PAEMX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: PAEMX (6.84) vs MEDBX (4.89). MEDBX was incepted earlier than PAEMX: MEDBX (23 years) vs PAEMX (28 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than PAEMX (1.67). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PAEMX (55.00). MEDBX (1000) and PAEMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PAEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.86 vs. MEDBX (6.82). PAEMX return over 5 years is better than : 9.74 vs. MEDBX (4.40).
| MEDBX | PAEMX | MEDBX / PAEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.67 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.67 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.333 | 7.731 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 2.19B | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 6.84 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 9.86 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 28.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.40 | 9.74 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.16 | 46.46 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement