Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs PAIKX
MEDBX vs PAIKX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs PAIKX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Adv
Price$9.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.82B
MEDBX vs PAIKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. PAIKX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and PAIKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.24B vs. PAIKX (4.82B). PAIKX (5.80) and MEDBX (5.69) have matching dividends . MEDBX was incepted earlier than PAIKX: MEDBX (23 years) vs PAIKX (10 years). PAIKX (2.55) is less costly to investors than MEDBX (1.82). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PAIKX (40.20). MEDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAIKX: MEDBX (1000) vs PAIKX (2500). MEDBX (8.18) and PAIKX (8.13) have marching annual gain over last year. PAIKX return over 5 years is better than : 11.36 vs. MEDBX (7.26).
| MEDBX | PAIKX | MEDBX / PAIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.15 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 2.55 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.981 | 4.078 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.24B | 4.82B | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 5.80 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 8.13 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.19 | 30.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.26 | 11.36 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement