Ad is loading...
MEDBX vs PRXIX
MEDBX vs PRXIX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs PRXIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$11.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond I
Price$9.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74B
MEDBX vs PRXIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. PRXIX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and PRXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. PRXIX (4.74B). PRXIX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: PRXIX (6.29) vs MEDBX (5.77). MEDBX was incepted earlier than PRXIX: MEDBX (23 years) vs PRXIX (10 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than PRXIX (0.73). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PRXIX (40.20). MEDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRXIX: MEDBX (1000) vs PRXIX (500000). PRXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. MEDBX (5.96). PRXIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.41 vs. MEDBX (11.39).
| MEDBX | PRXIX | MEDBX / PRXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.69 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.73 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.339 | 1.919 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7B | 4.74B | 148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.77 | 6.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 6.97 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.38 | 21.58 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.39 | 21.41 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...