Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs REGEX
MEDBX vs REGEX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs REGEX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
American Funds Emerging Markets Bd R4
Price$7.97
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.29B
MEDBX vs REGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. REGEX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and REGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. REGEX (3.29B). REGEX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: REGEX (5.53) vs MEDBX (4.89). MEDBX was incepted earlier than REGEX: MEDBX (23 years) vs REGEX (9 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REGEX (0.89). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REGEX (43.00). REGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: REGEX (250) vs MEDBX (1000). MEDBX (6.82) and REGEX (6.70) have marching annual gain over last year. REGEX return over 5 years is better than : 9.84 vs. MEDBX (4.40).
| MEDBX | REGEX | MEDBX / REGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.89 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.89 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.333 | 8.476 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4B | 3.29B | 225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 5.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 6.70 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 25.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.40 | 9.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement