Ad is loading...
MEDDX vs REBAX
MEDDX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDDX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R1
Price$11.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.97B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.68M
MEDDX vs REBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDDX vs. REBAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDDX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDDX has more cash in the bank: 6.97B vs. REBAX (278M). MEDDX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDDX (5.77) vs REBAX (5.16). MEDDX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDDX (16 years) vs REBAX (19 years). MEDDX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDDX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDDX (0) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. MEDDX (5.61). REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.72 vs. MEDDX (10.52).
| MEDDX | REBAX | MEDDX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.915 | 1.796 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 278M | 2,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.77 | 5.16 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 6.48 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.89 | 17.71 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.52 | 14.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.00 | 27.71 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers