Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDDX vs REBAX
MEDDX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDDX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R1
Price$12.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.65M
MEDDX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDDX vs. REBAX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDDX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDDX has more cash in the bank: 7.24B vs. REBAX (288M). MEDDX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDDX (5.68) vs REBAX (5.12). MEDDX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDDX (17 years) vs REBAX (19 years). MEDDX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDDX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDDX (0) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX (8.48) and MEDDX (8.18) have marching annual gain over last year. REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.15 vs. MEDDX (7.26).
| MEDDX | REBAX | MEDDX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.981 | 4.639 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.24B | 288M | 2,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.68 | 5.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 8.48 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.18 | 26.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.26 | 10.15 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.22 | 34.30 | 79% |