Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDFX vs PAIKX
MEDFX vs PAIKX Comparison
Open Charts MEDFX vs PAIKX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R3
Price$12.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.49B
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Adv
Price$9.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
MEDFX vs PAIKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDFX vs. PAIKX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDFX is a Hold and PAIKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDFX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. PAIKX (4.98B). PAIKX (5.71) and MEDFX (5.63) have matching dividends . MEDFX was incepted earlier than PAIKX: MEDFX (17 years) vs PAIKX (10 years). PAIKX (2.55) is less costly to investors than MEDFX (1.07). MEDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PAIKX (40.20). MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAIKX: MEDFX (0) vs PAIKX (2500). PAIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. MEDFX (8.15). PAIKX (9.26) and MEDFX (9.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MEDFX | PAIKX | MEDFX / PAIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.15 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.55 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.752 | 7.650 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.49B | 4.98B | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.63 | 5.71 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 8.72 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.02 | 27.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.18 | 9.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement