Ad is loading...
MEDHX vs PFSIX
MEDHX vs PFSIX Comparison
Open Charts MEDHX vs PFSIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$11.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
PIMCO Emerg Mkts Full Spectrum Bd Instl
Price$6.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.11M
MEDHX vs PFSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDHX vs. PFSIX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDHX is a Hold and PFSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. PFSIX (186M). MEDHX (6.89) and PFSIX (6.74) have matching dividends . MEDHX was incepted earlier than PFSIX: MEDHX (19 years) vs PFSIX (12 years). PFSIX (2.38) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PFSIX (51.00). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSIX: MEDHX (0) vs PFSIX (1000000). PFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.28 vs. MEDHX (6.61). PFSIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.25 vs. MEDHX (17.71).
| MEDHX | PFSIX | MEDHX / PFSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.59 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.542 | 5.248 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.96B | 186M | 3,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.89 | 6.74 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 8.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.06 | 23.60 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.71 | 20.25 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.30 | 28.21 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...