MEIYF
Price
$12.73
Change
+$0.62 (+5.12%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
808.85M
NIPOF
Price
$503.16
Change
+$45.87 (+10.03%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEIYF vs NIPOF

Header iconMEIYF vs NIPOF Comparison
Open Charts MEIYF vs NIPOFBanner chart's image
Mercialys Paris
Price$12.73
Change+$0.62 (+5.12%)
Volume$294
Capitalization808.85M
Japan Hotel REIT Investment
Price$503.16
Change+$45.87 (+10.03%)
Volume$1
Capitalization2.44B
MEIYF vs NIPOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEIYF vs. NIPOF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEIYF is a Hold and NIPOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MEIYF: $12.73 vs. NIPOF: $503.16)
Brand notoriety: MEIYF and NIPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEIYF: 29% vs. NIPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MEIYF: $808.85M vs. NIPOF: $2.44B
MEIYF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $808.85M. NIPOF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEIYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEIYF is a better buy in the long-term than NIPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEIYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MEIYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

MEIYF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +5.10% price change this week, while NIPOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.39% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIPOF($2.44B) has a higher market cap than MEIYF($809M). NIPOF has higher P/E ratio than MEIYF: NIPOF (26.72) vs MEIYF (11.36). MEIYF YTD gains are higher at: 24.026 vs. NIPOF (4.441). NIPOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. MEIYF (138M). NIPOF has more cash in the bank: 28.5B vs. MEIYF (91.7M). MEIYF has less debt than NIPOF: MEIYF (1.22B) vs NIPOF (165B). NIPOF has higher revenues than MEIYF: NIPOF (26.6B) vs MEIYF (216M).
MEIYFNIPOFMEIYF / NIPOF
Capitalization809M2.44B33%
EBITDA138M15B1%
Gain YTD24.0264.441541%
P/E Ratio11.3626.7243%
Revenue216M26.6B1%
Total Cash91.7M28.5B0%
Total Debt1.22B165B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEIYF vs NIPOF: Fundamental Ratings
MEIYF
NIPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9938
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6811
SMR RATING
1..100
9067
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MEIYF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIPOF (77). This means that MEIYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIPOF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEIYF (68). This means that NIPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEIYF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPOF's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as MEIYF (90). This means that NIPOF’s stock grew similarly to MEIYF’s over the last 12 months.

MEIYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPOF (56). This means that MEIYF’s stock grew similarly to NIPOF’s over the last 12 months.

MEIYF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPOF (61). This means that MEIYF’s stock grew similarly to NIPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEIYFNIPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSTKX19.41N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc Inv
AWPCX17.24N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic C
IJSTX15.53N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity S2
JDMNX149.66N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Enterprise N
PJDZX18.13N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Z

MEIYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEIYF has been loosely correlated with LNSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEIYF jumps, then LNSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEIYF
1D Price
Change %
MEIYF100%
N/A
LNSPF - MEIYF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAPIF - MEIYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - MEIYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FESNF - MEIYF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHMI - MEIYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More

NIPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPOF and CTO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPOF and CTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPOF
1D Price
Change %
NIPOF100%
N/A
CTO - NIPOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
NPONF - NIPOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRPRF - NIPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - NIPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - NIPOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More