MET
Price
$96.13
Change
-$0.94 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
61.85B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$86.11
Change
-$0.66 (-0.76%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.63B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MET vs UNM

MET vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. UNM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Hold and UNM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MET: $96.13 vs. UNM: $86.11)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. UNM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 148% vs. UNM: 92%
Market capitalization -- MET: $61.85B vs. UNM: $13.63B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $61.85B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $13.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MET and UNM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MET and UNM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.10% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($61.9B) has a higher market cap than UNM($13.6B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than MET: UNM (19.98) vs MET (18.59). MET YTD gains are higher at: 23.587 vs. UNM (13.110). MET has more cash in the bank: 121B vs. UNM (36.5B). UNM has less debt than MET: UNM (3.76B) vs MET (21.1B). MET has higher revenues than UNM: MET (76B) vs UNM (13.2B).
METUNMMET / UNM
Capitalization61.9B13.6B455%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.58713.110180%
P/E Ratio18.5919.9893%
Revenue76B13.2B576%
Total Cash121B36.5B332%
Total Debt21.1B3.76B561%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
MET
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
263
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
187
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (38). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (26). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's SMR Rating (91) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (96). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNM (48). This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (18). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPOK10.900.15
+1.40%
Spok Holdings
HOOD86.56-0.04
-0.05%
Robinhood Markets
MXC8.68-0.13
-1.48%
Mexco Energy Corp
COLL35.39-0.59
-1.64%
Collegium Pharmaceutical
OGC24.13-0.77
-3.09%
Oceanagold Corporation

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
-0.76%
CNO - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
MET - UNM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
PRI - UNM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
GL - UNM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
LNC - UNM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More