MET
Price
$93.05
Change
+$1.40 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
59.86B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$89.39
Change
+$1.89 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.29B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MET vs UNM

MET vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. UNM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a StrongBuy and UNM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MET: $93.03 vs. UNM: $87.50)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. UNM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 74% vs. UNM: 90%
Market capitalization -- MET: $59.86B vs. UNM: $14.29B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $59.86B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $14.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MET and UNM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than UNM.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +2.84% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -5.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.35% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($59.9B) has a higher market cap than UNM($14.3B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than MET: UNM (19.35) vs MET (17.99). MET YTD gains are higher at: 19.602 vs. UNM (16.758). MET has more cash in the bank: 121B vs. UNM (35.5B). UNM has less debt than MET: UNM (3.76B) vs MET (21.1B). MET has higher revenues than UNM: MET (76B) vs UNM (13.2B).
METUNMMET / UNM
Capitalization59.9B14.3B419%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.60216.758117%
P/E Ratio17.9919.3593%
Revenue76B13.2B576%
Total Cash121B35.5B341%
Total Debt21.1B3.76B561%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
MET
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
303
SMR RATING
1..100
9691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (41). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (30). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's SMR Rating (91) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (96). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (49). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (21). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGPS1.030.20
+23.96%
LogProstyle Inc
ASIC25.110.99
+4.10%
Ategrity Specialty Insurance Company Holdings
RYAN41.761.35
+3.34%
Ryan Specialty Holdings
NKSH35.990.07
+0.19%
National Bankshares
SLB47.36-0.40
-0.84%
SLB Limited

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+2.18%
CNO - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
MET - UNM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
PRI - UNM
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
GL - UNM
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AFL - UNM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More