Ad is loading...
MEXGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
USHAF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MEXGF vs USHAF

Header iconMEXGF vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts MEXGF vs USHAFBanner chart's image
MEXICAN GOLD MNG
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.91K
CapitalizationN/A
USHA RES
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$5.2K
CapitalizationN/A
MEXGF vs USHAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEXGF vs. USHAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEXGF is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MEXGF: $0.03 vs. USHAF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: MEXGF and USHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEXGF: 58% vs. USHAF: 21%
Market capitalization -- MEXGF: $1.49M vs. USHAF: $6.07M
MEXGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.49M. USHAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the long-term than MEXGF.

Price Growth

MEXGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -32.00% price change this week, while USHAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USHAF($6.07M) has a higher market cap than MEXGF($1.49M). USHAF YTD gains are higher at: -41.261 vs. MEXGF (-44.565). MEXGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -439.09K vs. USHAF (-2.34M). USHAF has more cash in the bank: 1.02M vs. MEXGF (44.1K). MEXGF (0) and USHAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MEXGFUSHAFMEXGF / USHAF
Capitalization1.49M6.07M25%
EBITDA-439.09K-2.34M19%
Gain YTD-44.565-41.261108%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash44.1K1.02M4%
Total Debt450KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEXGF: Fundamental Ratings
MEXGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAKIX25.450.09
+0.35%
Oakmark International Investor
GKIRX26.39-0.10
-0.38%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Inv
SZCCX38.61-0.40
-1.03%
DWS Small Cap Core C
DEYCX16.66-0.23
-1.36%
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity C
SGFFX45.77-0.80
-1.72%
Sparrow Growth A

MEXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEXGF has been loosely correlated with CRTIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEXGF jumps, then CRTIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEXGF
1D Price
Change %
MEXGF100%
-2.24%
CRTIF - MEXGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - MEXGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-40.00%
STBMF - MEXGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLGDF - MEXGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMOFF - MEXGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.24%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and KOOYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and KOOYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
-11.18%
KOOYF - USHAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-14.10%
RGLD - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
MEXGF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
ADYRF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMDMF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More