Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBHX vs PCWCX
MFBHX vs PCWCX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs PCWCX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
PGIM Corporate Bond C
Price$9.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.76M
MFBHX vs PCWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. PCWCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and PCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFBHX has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. PCWCX (19.8M). MFBHX pays higher dividends than PCWCX: MFBHX (4.54) vs PCWCX (2.92). MFBHX was incepted earlier than PCWCX: MFBHX (20 years) vs PCWCX (10 years). PCWCX (3.33) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). MFBHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PCWCX (17.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCWCX: MFBHX (0) vs PCWCX (1000). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.26 vs. PCWCX (3.15). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.40 vs. PCWCX (-5.82).
| MFBHX | PCWCX | MFBHX / PCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.55 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 3.33 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.420 | 1.849 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51B | 19.8M | 22,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 2.92 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 3.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.63 | 10.80 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | -5.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.13 | 16.02 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement