Ad is loading...
MFBHX vs RCBGX
MFBHX vs RCBGX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs RCBGX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.53B
American Funds Corporate Bond R2E
Price$9.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
MFBHX vs RCBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. RCBGX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and RCBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFBHX has more cash in the bank: 4.53B vs. RCBGX (1.95B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than RCBGX: MFBHX (4.48) vs RCBGX (3.69). MFBHX was incepted earlier than RCBGX: MFBHX (20 years) vs RCBGX (9 years). RCBGX (1.12) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). RCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. MFBHX (59.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCBGX: MFBHX (0) vs RCBGX (250). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. RCBGX (6.39). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -2.20 vs. RCBGX (-6.87).
| MFBHX | RCBGX | MFBHX / RCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.11 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.12 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.804 | 2.047 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 1.95B | 232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.48 | 3.69 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 6.39 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.91 | 5.55 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.20 | -6.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...