Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBHX vs RCBGX
MFBHX vs RCBGX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs RCBGX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.31
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
American Funds Corporate Bond R2E
Price$9.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
MFBHX vs RCBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. RCBGX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and RCBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFBHX has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. RCBGX (1.92B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than RCBGX: MFBHX (4.49) vs RCBGX (3.46). MFBHX was incepted earlier than RCBGX: MFBHX (20 years) vs RCBGX (9 years). RCBGX (1.12) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). RCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. MFBHX (38.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCBGX: MFBHX (0) vs RCBGX (250). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. RCBGX (2.11). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -6.69 vs. RCBGX (-11.52).
| MFBHX | RCBGX | MFBHX / RCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.11 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.12 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.819 | 1.642 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51B | 1.92B | 235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 3.46 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 2.11 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 6.52 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.69 | -11.52 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement