Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBKX vs PCNNX
MFBKX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts MFBKX vs PCNNX
MFS Corporate Bond R6
Price$12.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.39B
MFBKX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBKX vs. PCNNX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBKX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MFBKX (4.55B). MFBKX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: MFBKX (4.83) vs PCNNX (4.39). MFBKX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: MFBKX (13 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than MFBKX (0.43). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. MFBKX (38.00). MFBKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: MFBKX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX (5.46) and MFBKX (5.40) have marching annual gain over last year. PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.43 vs. MFBKX (-5.57).
| MFBKX | PCNNX | MFBKX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.24 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.29 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.090 | 4.248 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 12.4B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.83 | 4.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 5.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.88 | 11.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | -2.43 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers