MFIC
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 13, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
86 days until earnings call
MSDL
Price
$17.65
Change
-$0.10 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 13, 10:46 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.54B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFIC vs MSDL

Header iconMFIC vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts MFIC vs MSDLBanner chart's image
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$13.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$540
Capitalization1.22B
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$17.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.56%)
Volume$529
Capitalization1.54B
MFIC vs MSDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFIC vs. MSDL commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFIC is a Buy and MSDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (MFIC: $13.06 vs. MSDL: $17.75)
Brand notoriety: MFIC and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFIC: 144% vs. MSDL: 156%
Market capitalization -- MFIC: $1.22B vs. MSDL: $1.54B
MFIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.22B. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFIC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFIC’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFIC’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the short-term than MSDL.

Price Growth

MFIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.54B) has a higher market cap than MFIC($1.22B). MFIC has higher P/E ratio than MSDL: MFIC (10.88) vs MSDL (9.20). MFIC YTD gains are higher at: 2.690 vs. MSDL (-9.604). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 64.8M vs. MFIC (16.5M). MFIC (1.94B) and MSDL (2.01B) have identical debt. MSDL has higher revenues than MFIC: MSDL (192M) vs MFIC (113M).
MFICMSDLMFIC / MSDL
Capitalization1.22B1.54B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.690-9.604-28%
P/E Ratio10.889.20118%
Revenue113M192M59%
Total Cash16.5M64.8M25%
Total Debt1.94B2.01B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFICMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCVSX36.73N/A
N/A
Fidelity Convertible Securities
EGLCX10.24N/A
N/A
Eagle Energy Infrastructure C
RCSIX12.80N/A
N/A
RBC Small Cap Core I
CAPRX9.10N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Capital Income R
MXKWX10.10N/A
N/A
Empower S&P 500® Index Institutional

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
+0.28%
OBDC - MSDL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
CSWC - MSDL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
GLAD - MSDL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
BCSF - MSDL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
SLRC - MSDL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More