Ad is loading...
MFNKX vs RMUNX
MFNKX vs RMUNX Comparison
Open Charts MFNKX vs RMUNX
BlackRock NY Municipal Opps Inv C
Price$10.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Invesco Rochester® New York Municipals A
Price$14.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
MFNKX vs RMUNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNKX vs. RMUNX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNKX is a Hold and RMUNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMUNX has more cash in the bank: 4.18B vs. MFNKX (1.1B). RMUNX pays higher dividends than MFNKX: RMUNX (4.27) vs MFNKX (2.49). MFNKX was incepted earlier than RMUNX: MFNKX (19 years) vs RMUNX (39 years). MFNKX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RMUNX (1.27). MFNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RMUNX (27.00). MFNKX (1000) and RMUNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.33 vs. RMUNX (-0.64). RMUNX return over 5 years is better than : 9.60 vs. MFNKX (8.80).
| MFNKX | RMUNX | MFNKX / RMUNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.27 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.27 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.022 | -4.029 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 4.18B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 4.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.33 | -0.64 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.06 | 4.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 9.60 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.22 | 23.18 | 53% |