Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFNLX vs RLVSX
MFNLX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts MFNLX vs RLVSX
BlackRock National Municipal Inv C
Price$9.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.05B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
MFNLX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFNLX vs. RLVSX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFNLX is a Sell and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFNLX (6.05B) and RLVSX (5.88B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLVSX pays higher dividends than MFNLX: RLVSX (3.65) vs MFNLX (2.63). MFNLX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: MFNLX (19 years) vs RLVSX (40 years). MFNLX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). MFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLVSX (39.00). RLVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFNLX: RLVSX (0) vs MFNLX (1000). RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. MFNLX (-0.64). RLVSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.50 vs. MFNLX (-3.09).
| MFNLX | RLVSX | MFNLX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.51 | 296% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.57 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.380 | 0.138 | -1,002% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.05B | 5.88B | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.64 | 1.33 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.84 | 8.14 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.09 | -0.50 | 621% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.67 | 1.89 | 405% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement