Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFS MA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.77M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSSX vs. NBMAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSSX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX (384M) and MFSSX (382M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NBMAX pays higher dividends than MFSSX: NBMAX (3.54) vs MFSSX (3.19). MFSSX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: MFSSX (40 years) vs NBMAX (39 years). MFSSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.59). NBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. MFSSX (10.00). MFSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: MFSSX (1000) vs NBMAX (100000). MFSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.40 vs. NBMAX (-0.52). MFSSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.26 vs. NBMAX (-1.07).
| MFSSX | NBMAX | MFSSX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.59 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.59 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.965 | -2.137 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 384M | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.54 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.40 | -0.52 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.28 | 5.27 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.26 | -1.07 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.37 | 9.27 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers