Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFS MA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.47M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.52M
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSSX vs. NBMAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSSX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. MFSSX (377M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than MFSSX: NBMAX (3.56) vs MFSSX (3.19). MFSSX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: MFSSX (40 years) vs NBMAX (39 years). MFSSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.60). NBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. MFSSX (10.00). MFSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: MFSSX (1000) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX (-2.13) and MFSSX (-2.16) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. NBMAX (-3.13).
| MFSSX | NBMAX | MFSSX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.60 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.897 | -2.933 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 413M | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.56 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | -2.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.04 | 2.35 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.99 | -3.13 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.20 | 8.38 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers