Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts MFSSX vs NBMAX
MFS MA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.58M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.36M
MFSSX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSSX vs. NBMAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSSX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. MFSSX (376M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than MFSSX: NBMAX (3.62) vs MFSSX (3.23). MFSSX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: MFSSX (40 years) vs NBMAX (39 years). MFSSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.60). NBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. MFSSX (10.00). MFSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: MFSSX (1000) vs NBMAX (100000). MFSSX (-1.91) and NBMAX (-1.95) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.39 vs. NBMAX (-2.69).
| MFSSX | NBMAX | MFSSX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.60 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.921 | -2.189 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 411M | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.62 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -1.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 3.82 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.39 | -2.69 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.92 | 8.45 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers