Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSSX vs NMAAX
MFSSX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts MFSSX vs NMAAX
MFS MA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.41M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
MFSSX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSSX vs. NMAAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSSX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX (384M) and MFSSX (379M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NMAAX (3.34) and MFSSX (3.19) have matching dividends . MFSSX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: MFSSX (40 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). MFSSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.79). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MFSSX (17.00). MFSSX (4%) and NMAAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: MFSSX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). MFSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. NMAAX (-0.51). MFSSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.88 vs. NMAAX (-1.35).
| MFSSX | NMAAX | MFSSX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.79 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.79 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.164 | -2.331 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 101% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 384M | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -0.51 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.41 | 1.58 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.88 | -1.35 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.34 | 7.55 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement