Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFSSX vs NMAAX
MFSSX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts MFSSX vs NMAAX
MFS MA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.47M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.52M
MFSSX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFSSX vs. NMAAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFSSX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. MFSSX (377M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than MFSSX: NMAAX (3.36) vs MFSSX (3.19). MFSSX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: MFSSX (40 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). MFSSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.80). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. MFSSX (10.00). MFSSX (4%) and NMAAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MFSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: MFSSX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). MFSSX (-2.16) and NMAAX (-2.21) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. NMAAX (-4.02).
| MFSSX | NMAAX | MFSSX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.80 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.897 | -2.925 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 101% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 413M | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.36 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | -2.21 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.04 | 1.86 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.99 | -4.02 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.20 | 6.79 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers