MGA
Price
$41.27
Change
+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
21 days until earnings call
QS
Price
$5.41
Change
-$0.05 (-0.92%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MGA vs QS

Header iconMGA vs QS Comparison
Open Charts MGA vs QSBanner chart's image
Magna International
Price$41.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$587.69K
CapitalizationN/A
QuantumScape
Price$5.41
Change-$0.05 (-0.92%)
Volume$3.62M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MGA vs QS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MGA vs. QS commentary
Oct 11, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGA is a StrongBuy and QS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 11, 2024
Stock price -- (MGA: $41.27 vs. QS: $5.41)
Brand notoriety: MGA and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGA: 39% vs. QS: 75%
Market capitalization -- MGA: $15.65B vs. QS: $3.04B
MGA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $15.65B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.23% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGA is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.22% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than QS($3.04B). QS YTD gains are higher at: -22.158 vs. MGA (-27.989). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. QS (-392.95M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. QS (1.07B). QS has less debt than MGA: QS (101M) vs MGA (7.22B). MGA has higher revenues than QS: MGA (42.8B) vs QS (0).
MGAQSMGA / QS
Capitalization15.7B3.04B517%
EBITDA3.6B-392.95M-915%
Gain YTD-27.989-22.158126%
P/E Ratio12.61N/A-
Revenue42.8B0-
Total Cash1.2B1.07B112%
Total Debt7.22B101M7,151%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGA: Fundamental Ratings
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGAQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME20.910.41
+2.00%
GameStop Corp
SPY576.13-1.01
-0.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.04-0.50
-0.22%
Apple
BTC.X60274.500000-307.601560
-0.51%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA238.77-2.28
-0.95%
Tesla

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+0.07%
LEA - MGA
74%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
DAN - MGA
69%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
ADNT - MGA
68%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
AXL - MGA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ALV - MGA
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More