Ad is loading...
MGINX vs PASCX
MGINX vs PASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGINX vs. PASCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGINX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. MGINX (168M). PASCX pays higher dividends than MGINX: PASCX (5.01) vs MGINX (2.30). MGINX was incepted earlier than PASCX: MGINX (30 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than MGINX (0.95). PASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. MGINX (39.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGINX: PASCX (1000) vs MGINX (1000000). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. MGINX (4.96). PASCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.31 vs. MGINX (30.57).
| MGINX | PASCX | MGINX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 3.06 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 3.15 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.209 | 3.306 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 11.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 5.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 5.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.31 | 1.97 | 523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.57 | 46.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.03 | 43.15 | 109% |