MGK
Price
$90.12
Change
-$0.36 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
32.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCHG
Price
$35.78
Change
-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
63.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGK vs SCHG

MGK vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) vs. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG)

Key Takeaways

  • Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) targets mega-cap growth stocks with a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 70 holdings, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) offers broader exposure across roughly 200 large-cap growth names.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track growth-oriented U.S. equity indices, delivering similar sector allocations dominated by technology and consumer discretionary companies.
  • SCHG maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to MGK’s 0.05%, providing a modest but consistent cost advantage for long-term investors.
  • MGK’s focus on the largest mega-cap constituents results in higher concentration risk, whereas SCHG’s inclusion of additional large-cap growth stocks enhances diversification within the growth segment.
  • Both funds exhibit strong sensitivity to interest-rate expectations and earnings momentum in high-growth technology leaders, influencing their relative positioning during market rotations.
  • Structural differences in index construction and portfolio breadth create distinct risk-return profiles despite overlapping objectives in large-cap growth exposure.

Introduction

Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) represent two popular vehicles for investors seeking U.S. large-cap growth exposure. These ETFs compete directly within the same category, providing passive, market-cap-weighted access to companies with strong growth characteristics. Their relevance stems from sustained institutional and retail interest in growth equities amid evolving macroeconomic conditions, including interest-rate cycles and sector leadership shifts. While both target similar investor goals, differences in index methodology, concentration, and cost structure offer distinct positioning opportunities for portfolio construction.

Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) Overview

Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) seeks to track the performance of the Morningstar U.S. Mega Cap Growth Index. The fund holds approximately 70 securities, emphasizing the largest mega-cap growth companies. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Alphabet Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc., which together account for a substantial portion of assets. Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services. MGK features a net expense ratio of 0.05% and employs a passive indexing approach with quarterly rebalancing to maintain alignment with its benchmark. Its structure delivers concentrated exposure to the highest-capitalization growth names, distinguishing it through tighter focus on mega-cap leaders.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) aims to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. The fund maintains approximately 200 holdings, providing exposure to large-cap growth stocks selected from the broader U.S. equity market. Top holdings generally feature Apple Inc., NVIDIA Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc., and Alphabet Inc. Sector weightings mirror MGK with heavy allocations to technology and consumer discretionary areas. SCHG carries a net expense ratio of 0.04% and follows a passive strategy with periodic rebalancing. Its broader inclusion criteria result in greater diversification across the large-cap growth universe compared to more concentrated mega-cap peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth segment continues to benefit from innovation cycles in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital transformation. Macroeconomic drivers such as Federal Reserve policy on interest rates, corporate earnings growth in technology leaders, and capital allocation toward high-return sectors shape performance dynamics. Regulatory developments around antitrust scrutiny of dominant technology platforms and evolving tax policies represent ongoing considerations. Sector risks include valuation compression during periods of rising rates and potential slowdowns in earnings momentum. Capital flows into growth-oriented strategies remain elevated as investors balance growth potential against broader market volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated sensitivity to earnings seasons of mega-cap technology names and shifts in interest-rate expectations. MGK’s concentrated mega-cap tilt has produced periods of outperformance during strong leadership from the largest constituents, accompanied by modestly higher volatility. SCHG’s wider holdings have delivered more stable relative returns during rotations away from the very largest names. Both funds track closely with the broader large-cap growth category, with performance differentials arising primarily from index construction differences rather than active management decisions. Relative positioning favors SCHG for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and incremental diversification within the growth space.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 200 holdings, and comparable sector exposure support a modest preference for cost efficiency and risk mitigation while maintaining alignment with large-cap growth trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MGK vs. SCHG commentary
Aug 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGK is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 63.2B vs. MGK (32.4B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than MGK: SCHG (9.935) vs MGK (9.273). MGK was incepted earlier than SCHG: MGK (19 years) vs SCHG (17 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than MGK (0.05). SCHG has a higher turnover MGK (14.00) vs MGK (14.00).
MGKSCHGMGK / SCHG
Gain YTD9.2739.93593%
Net Assets32.4B63.2B51%
Total Expense Ratio0.050.04125%
Turnover14.0027.0052%
Yield0.340.3988%
Fund Existence19 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGKSCHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKRE6.340.01
+0.18%
Tuttle Cptl Dl 2X Invrs Rgnl Banks ETF
HEZU49.730.08
+0.16%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozn ETF
FPE17.69-0.01
-0.06%
First Trust Preferred Sec & Inc ETF
OVM21.24-0.02
-0.10%
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
MINV49.81-0.58
-1.15%
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF

MGK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGK has been loosely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGK jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGK
1D Price
Change %
MGK100%
-0.40%
ROP - MGK
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
DASH - MGK
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
ZM - MGK
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
ADI - MGK
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
XYZ - MGK
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More