It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MHLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MHLD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MHLD (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.
MHLD is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
MHLD | SAFT | MHLD / SAFT | |
Capitalization | 226M | 1.22B | 19% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -39.738 | 12.868 | -309% |
P/E Ratio | 6.22 | 63.23 | 10% |
Revenue | 83.5M | 926M | 9% |
Total Cash | 244M | 518M | 47% |
Total Debt | 255M | 49.8M | 512% |
MHLD | SAFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHLD (76). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
MHLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (82). This means that MHLD’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MHLD (96). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHLD (86). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHLD’s over the last 12 months.
MHLD's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (97). This means that MHLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
MHLD | SAFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | 4 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago45% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago75% | 6 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MHLD has been loosely correlated with GLRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MHLD jumps, then GLRE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MHLD | 100% | -6.76% | ||
GLRE - MHLD | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
STC - MHLD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
UFCS - MHLD | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
NODK - MHLD | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
SAFT - MHLD | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAFT | 100% | +0.02% | ||
L - SAFT | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
UFCS - SAFT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
THG - SAFT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
AFG - SAFT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
AXS - SAFT | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
More |