MHUBF vs RADLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHUBF is a Hold and RADLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MHUBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRADLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MHUBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RADLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
MHUBF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +15.33% price change this week, while RADLF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MHUBF | RADLF | MHUBF / RADLF | |
| Capitalization | 27.9M | 420K | 6,643% |
| EBITDA | -8.19M | -524.25K | 1,562% |
| Gain YTD | -1.603 | -81.557 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 528K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 897K | 436K | 206% |
| Total Debt | 776K | 479K | 162% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
MHUBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and INTZ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and INTZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHUBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHUBF | 100% | +7.97% | ||
| INTZ - MHUBF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.62% | ||
| PHUN - MHUBF | 22% Poorly correlated | +17.98% | ||
| OMCL - MHUBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BKKT - MHUBF | 13% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
| RADLF - MHUBF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RADLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RADLF has been closely correlated with DAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RADLF jumps, then DAVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RADLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RADLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DAVA - RADLF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| LPSN - RADLF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SNOW - RADLF | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EVTC - RADLF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| DV - RADLF | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
More | ||||