MIFF
Price
$26.00
Change
+$1.90 (+7.88%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MLGF
Price
$20.32
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MIFF vs MLGF

Header iconMIFF vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts MIFF vs MLGFBanner chart's image
Mifflinburg Ban
Price$26.00
Change+$1.90 (+7.88%)
Volume$3.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Malaga Financial
Price$20.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$200
Capitalization41.82M
MIFF vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MIFF vs. MLGF commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIFF is a Hold and MLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MIFF: $26.00 vs. MLGF: $20.32)
Brand notoriety: MIFF and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MIFF: 691% vs. MLGF: 11%
Market capitalization -- MIFF: $0 vs. MLGF: $41.82M
MIFF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MIFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MIFF and MLGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MIFF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.43% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.99% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIFF YTD gains are higher at: 7.239 vs. MLGF (-7.029).
MIFFMLGFMIFF / MLGF
CapitalizationN/A41.8M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.239-7.029-103%
P/E RatioN/A7.61-
RevenueN/A18M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A263M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIFF vs MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
MIFF
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7816
SMR RATING
1..100
6445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1365
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MIFF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (36). This means that MIFF’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIFF (78). This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIFF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MIFF (64). This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to MIFF’s over the last 12 months.

MIFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (74). This means that MIFF’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MIFF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGF (65). This means that MIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMA8.670.02
+0.23%
Destra Multi-Alternative Fund
SEIM41.300.09
+0.22%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momt Fac ETF
BSMR23.430.02
+0.09%
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF
GSUS84.01N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF
RZC25.62-0.18
-0.70%
Reinsurance Group of America

MIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIFF and CARV have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIFF and CARV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIFF
1D Price
Change %
MIFF100%
N/A
CARV - MIFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
BKPKF - MIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - MIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
MNAT - MIFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - MIFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
N/A
RBKB - MLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - MLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
CMUV - MLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - MLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MLGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
More