MJDLF
Price
$6.68
Change
-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
595.69M
SCCO
Price
$105.86
Change
-$0.23 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
82.35B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJDLF vs SCCO

Header iconMJDLF vs SCCO Comparison
Open Charts MJDLF vs SCCOBanner chart's image
Major Drilling Group International
Price$6.68
Change-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Volume$2.8K
Capitalization595.69M
Southern Copper
Price$105.86
Change-$0.23 (-0.22%)
Volume$718.13K
Capitalization82.35B
MJDLF vs SCCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJDLF vs. SCCO commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJDLF is a Hold and SCCO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MJDLF: $6.68 vs. SCCO: $105.86)
Brand notoriety: MJDLF and SCCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJDLF: 21% vs. SCCO: 56%
Market capitalization -- MJDLF: $595.69M vs. SCCO: $82.35B
MJDLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $595.69M. SCCO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $82.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJDLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCCO is a better buy in the long-term than MJDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJDLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCCO is a better buy in the short-term than MJDLF.

Price Growth

MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while SCCO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCCO($82.4B) has a higher market cap than MJDLF($596M). SCCO has higher P/E ratio than MJDLF: SCCO (34.09) vs MJDLF (10.27). SCCO YTD gains are higher at: 19.978 vs. MJDLF (18.021). SCCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.12B vs. MJDLF (146M). SCCO has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. MJDLF (94.4M). MJDLF has less debt than SCCO: MJDLF (25.6M) vs SCCO (7.03B). SCCO has higher revenues than MJDLF: SCCO (9.9B) vs MJDLF (736M).
MJDLFSCCOMJDLF / SCCO
Capitalization596M82.4B1%
EBITDA146M5.12B3%
Gain YTD18.02119.97890%
P/E Ratio10.2734.0930%
Revenue736M9.9B7%
Total Cash94.4M1.75B5%
Total Debt25.6M7.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJDLF vs SCCO: Fundamental Ratings
MJDLF
SCCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5068
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5125
SMR RATING
1..100
8223
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCCO's Valuation (11) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MJDLF (74) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (51) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's SMR Rating (23) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MJDLF (82) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCO's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MJDLF (43) in the null industry. This means that SCCO’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCCO (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJDLFSCCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGSCX6.220.07
+1.14%
Alger Small Cap Growth C
GTSDX8.940.10
+1.13%
Invesco Small Cap Growth C
TRPGX15.620.16
+1.03%
Nuveen Core Equity Premier
HEMDX10.580.08
+0.76%
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets D
JFCCX34.750.19
+0.55%
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core C

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
-1.33%
FCX - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
HBM - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
LUNMF - MJDLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
CSCCF - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
SCCO - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

SCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCO has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCCO jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCO
1D Price
Change %
SCCO100%
-0.22%
TECK - SCCO
87%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
FCX - SCCO
84%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
HBM - SCCO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BHP - SCCO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
ERO - SCCO
79%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
More