It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MKC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MKC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
MKC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while SENEB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.65%.
MKC is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.
SENEB is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
MKC | SENEB | MKC / SENEB | |
Capitalization | 20.6B | 409M | 5,037% |
EBITDA | 1.24B | 145M | 854% |
Gain YTD | 14.507 | 53.717 | 27% |
P/E Ratio | 29.24 | 7.48 | 391% |
Revenue | 6.7B | 1.48B | 452% |
Total Cash | 178M | 7.17M | 2,483% |
Total Debt | 4.46B | 669M | 666% |
MKC | SENEB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKC's Valuation (43) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEB (74). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKC (100). This means that SENEB’s stock grew significantly faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.
MKC's SMR Rating (55) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEB (79). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (50). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKC (55). This means that SENEB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.
MKC | SENEB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago54% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKC has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKC jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEB and HRL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEB and HRL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SENEB | 100% | N/A | ||
HRL - SENEB | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
SENEA - SENEB | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
BRCC - SENEB | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
STKL - SENEB | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
MKC - SENEB | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More |