ML
Price
$85.90
Change
+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
698.72M
PHR
Price
$24.49
Change
-$1.00 (-3.92%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ML vs PHR

Header iconML vs PHR Comparison
Open Charts ML vs PHRBanner chart's image
MoneyLion
Price$85.90
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
Volume$2.72M
Capitalization698.72M
Phreesia
Price$24.49
Change-$1.00 (-3.92%)
Volume$353.42K
Capitalization1.3B
ML vs PHR Comparison Chart
Loading...
PHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ML vs. PHR commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ML is a Hold and PHR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (ML: $85.90 vs. PHR: $24.49)
Brand notoriety: ML and PHR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ML: 177% vs. PHR: 71%
Market capitalization -- ML: $698.72M vs. PHR: $1.3B
ML [@Packaged Software] is valued at $698.72M. PHR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ML’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHR is a better buy in the long-term than ML.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ML (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHR (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

ML is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

PHR is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.35% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHR($1.3B) has a higher market cap than ML($699M). ML YTD gains are higher at: -0.128 vs. PHR (-2.663). ML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17M vs. PHR (-104M). ML has more cash in the bank: 92.2M vs. PHR (87.5M). PHR has less debt than ML: PHR (12M) vs ML (190M). ML has higher revenues than PHR: ML (423M) vs PHR (356M).
MLPHRML / PHR
Capitalization699M1.3B54%
EBITDA7.17M-104M-7%
Gain YTD-0.128-2.6635%
P/E Ratio1.80N/A-
Revenue423M356M119%
Total Cash92.2M87.5M105%
Total Debt190M12M1,583%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PHR: Fundamental Ratings
PHR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PASRX19.57N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R
FCGAX137.77N/A
N/A
Franklin Growth Adv
NOLVX20.93N/A
N/A
Northern Large Cap Value
MVGJX17.66-0.12
-0.67%
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R1
FCICX17.17-0.16
-0.92%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl C

ML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ML has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ML jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ML
1D Price
Change %
ML100%
N/A
COIN - ML
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
RIOT - ML
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
CLSK - ML
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.23%
PHR - ML
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
QTWO - ML
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
More