Ad is loading...
MLFIX vs RBEKX
MLFIX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLFIX vs. RBEKX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLFIX is a Hold and RBEKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEKX has more cash in the bank: 43.9B vs. MLFIX (770M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: MLFIX (2.84) vs RBEKX (0.86). MLFIX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: MLFIX (20 years) vs RBEKX (11 years). RBEKX (1.16) is less costly to investors than MLFIX (0.76). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. RBEKX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEKX: MLFIX (0) vs RBEKX (250). RBEKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.70 vs. MLFIX (6.26). MLFIX return over 5 years is better than : 50.91 vs. RBEKX (43.50).
| MLFIX | RBEKX | MLFIX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.16 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.16 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.103 | -0.250 | -41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 770M | 43.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 0.86 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 7.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.94 | 17.07 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.91 | 43.50 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.65 | 51.59 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...