Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLFIX vs RHGTX
MLFIX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLFIX vs. RHGTX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLFIX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. MLFIX (796M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs RHGTX (1.39). MLFIX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: MLFIX (20 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). MLFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RHGTX (0.50). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: MLFIX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. MLFIX (8.16). MLFIX (40.92) and RHGTX (40.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MLFIX | RHGTX | MLFIX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.50 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.201 | 6.490 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 796M | 46.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.39 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 11.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.96 | 26.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.92 | 40.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement