Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMFGX vs RBATX
MMFGX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMFGX vs. RBATX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMFGX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. MMFGX (4.44M). RBATX pays higher dividends than MMFGX: RBATX (2.10) vs MMFGX (1.85). MMFGX was incepted earlier than RBATX: MMFGX (7 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than MMFGX (1.18). MMFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). MMFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: MMFGX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX (6.33) and MMFGX (6.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 16.71 vs. MMFGX (2.95).
| MMFGX | RBATX | MMFGX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.38 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.38 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.527 | 5.061 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44M | 3.85B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 2.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 6.33 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.04 | 17.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 16.71 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement