Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMHVX vs PIMAX
MMHVX vs PIMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHVX vs PIMAX
NYLI MacKay High Yield Muni Bond Inv Cl
Price$11.31
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.19B
Victory Pioneer High Income Mun A
Price$5.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets987.65M
MMHVX vs PIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHVX vs. PIMAX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHVX is a Hold and PIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMHVX has more cash in the bank: 9.19B vs. PIMAX (988M). PIMAX pays higher dividends than MMHVX: PIMAX (5.07) vs MMHVX (4.11). MMHVX was incepted earlier than PIMAX: MMHVX (15 years) vs PIMAX (19 years). MMHVX (0.90) and PIMAX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . PIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. MMHVX (17.00). PIMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHVX (3%) vs MMHVX (3%). PIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHVX: PIMAX (1000) vs MMHVX (2500). PIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. MMHVX (-1.77). MMHVX return over 5 years is better than : 5.52 vs. PIMAX (2.26).
| MMHVX | PIMAX | MMHVX / PIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.82 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.87 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.639 | -2.660 | 99% |
| Front Load | 3% | 5% | 56% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 988M | 930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 5.07 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.77 | 0.93 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.85 | 2.95 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.52 | 2.26 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.69 | 27.07 | 124% |