Ad is loading...
MMHVX vs PIMAX
MMHVX vs PIMAX Comparison
Open Charts MMHVX vs PIMAX
NYLI MacKay High Yield Muni Bond Inv Cl
Price$11.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
Pioneer High Income Municipal A
Price$6.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
MMHVX vs PIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMHVX vs. PIMAX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMHVX is a Hold and PIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMHVX has more cash in the bank: 9.42B vs. PIMAX (1.03B). PIMAX pays higher dividends than MMHVX: PIMAX (4.92) vs MMHVX (4.08). MMHVX was incepted earlier than PIMAX: MMHVX (15 years) vs PIMAX (19 years). MMHVX (0.90) and PIMAX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . PIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. MMHVX (17.00). PIMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MMHVX (3%) vs MMHVX (3%). PIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMHVX: PIMAX (1000) vs MMHVX (2500). PIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. MMHVX (1.89). MMHVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.44 vs. PIMAX (9.94).
| MMHVX | PIMAX | MMHVX / PIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.82 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.87 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.278 | -1.229 | 185% |
| Front Load | 3% | 5% | 56% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 1.03B | 917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 4.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 5.98 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.01 | 4.06 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 9.94 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.80 | 26.48 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...