MMND vs PGPEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMND is a Hold and PGPEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MMND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PGPEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
MMND (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а +22.75% price change this week, while PGPEF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.45%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-4.01% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| MMND | PGPEF | MMND / PGPEF | |
| Capitalization | 4.83M | 20.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 844K | 2.77B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -52.653 | 9.703 | -543% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.12 | 14.03 | 51% |
| Revenue | 4.78M | 14.8B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.39M | 3.68B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 0 | 6.19B | - |
MMND | PGPEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PGPEF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMND (62). This means that PGPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMND’s over the last 12 months.
PGPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMND (100). This means that PGPEF’s stock grew significantly faster than MMND’s over the last 12 months.
MMND's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPEF (63). This means that MMND’s stock grew similarly to PGPEF’s over the last 12 months.
PGPEF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MMND (64). This means that PGPEF’s stock grew similarly to MMND’s over the last 12 months.
PGPEF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MMND (88). This means that PGPEF’s stock grew similarly to MMND’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
MMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MMND and PUBGY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMND and PUBGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMND | 100% | N/A | ||
| PUBGY - MMND | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.79% | ||
| JCDXF - MMND | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
| PGPEF - MMND | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
| HKUOY - MMND | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KDOZF - MMND | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PGPEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPEF and BAOS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPEF and BAOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGPEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGPEF | 100% | -2.45% | ||
| BAOS - PGPEF | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| FLNT - PGPEF | 14% Poorly correlated | -6.62% | ||
| EEX - PGPEF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| OMC - PGPEF | 7% Poorly correlated | -7.79% | ||
| PUBGY - PGPEF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.79% | ||
More | ||||