It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MMRGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRTMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMRGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRTMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MMRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while MRTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +23.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.05%.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
MMRGF | MRTMF | MMRGF / MRTMF | |
Capitalization | 37.3M | 22.1M | 169% |
EBITDA | -8.45M | -1.49M | 568% |
Gain YTD | -18.050 | 27.667 | -65% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 2.44M | 530K | 460% |
Total Debt | 83.8K | 350K | 24% |
MMRGF | MRTMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRTMF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (64). This means that MRTMF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that MRTMF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (97). This means that MRTMF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTMF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMRGF (83). This means that MRTMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRTMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that MRTMF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.
MMRGF | MRTMF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago82% | 3 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago88% | 7 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DDIV | 38.25 | 0.29 | +0.76% |
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF | |||
ECLN | 29.08 | 0.15 | +0.50% |
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | |||
CALF | 44.50 | 0.16 | +0.36% |
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
GAPR | 37.62 | 0.10 | +0.26% |
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buf ETF - Apr | |||
HFXI | 25.98 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMRGF has been loosely correlated with SSVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMRGF jumps, then SSVRF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMRGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMRGF | 100% | +4.88% | ||
SSVRF - MMRGF | 39% Loosely correlated | +8.11% | ||
DSVSF - MMRGF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
KOOYF - MMRGF | 36% Loosely correlated | +12.90% | ||
AG - MMRGF | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
BTG - MMRGF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRTMF and ANGPY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRTMF and ANGPY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRTMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MRTMF | 100% | +9.43% | ||
ANGPY - MRTMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
AUCCF - MRTMF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MMNGF - MRTMF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
MMTMF - MRTMF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MMRGF - MRTMF | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.88% | ||
More |