Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.05M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. MNBAX (524M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (2.23) vs MNBAX (1.93). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. MNBAX (4.66). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. MNBAX (10.55).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.283 | 4.750 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 243B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 2.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 7.34 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 24.05 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 36.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.31 | 62.29 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement