Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$18.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.61M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$33.73
Change+$0.44 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. MNBAX (502M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (2.31) vs MNBAX (1.98). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.00 vs. MNBAX (1.86). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.55 vs. MNBAX (12.58).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.658 | -3.697 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 227B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 2.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 12.98 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 34.55 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.43 | 46.24 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...