Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.92M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$34.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MNBAX (521M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (2.31) vs MNBAX (1.98). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (31 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. MNBAX (3.85). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 52.19 vs. MNBAX (25.20).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.469 | 0.483 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 4.65 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 13.33 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 52.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.48 | 55.48 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...