Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBGX
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBGX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.08
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.6M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$36.44
Change+$0.27 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.64B
MNBAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. MNBAX (526M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBGX (2.23) vs MNBAX (1.93). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBGX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. MNBAX (4.69). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. MNBAX (14.42).
| MNBAX | RLBGX | MNBAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.25 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.012 | 6.910 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 248B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 2.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 7.76 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.35 | 33.86 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.42 | 44.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.16 | 67.11 | 43% |