Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLEFX
MNBAX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$18.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.61M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$33.24
Change+$0.34 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
MNBAX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLEFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. MNBAX (502M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLEFX (2.16) vs MNBAX (1.98). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLEFX (9 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.40). RLEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). MNBAX (1.86) and RLEFX (1.84) have marching annual gain over last year. RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.74 vs. MNBAX (12.58).
| MNBAX | RLEFX | MNBAX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.40 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.40 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.658 | -3.738 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 225B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 1.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 12.56 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 33.74 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...