Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RGSFX
MNHCX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RGSFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.63
Change-$0.34 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.98M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$26.03
Change-$0.53 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
MNHCX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RGSFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. MNHCX (471M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: RGSFX (0.81) vs MNHCX (0.19). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RGSFX (9 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RGSFX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. MNHCX (5.33). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.94 vs. MNHCX (-0.67).
| MNHCX | RGSFX | MNHCX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.767 | 2.764 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 471M | 21.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.81 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.33 | 10.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.07 | 15.91 | -0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.67 | 34.94 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...