Ad is loading...
MNOZX vs RERFX
MNOZX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs RERFX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$32.32
Change+$2.19 (+7.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.41M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$51.73
Change+$2.46 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
MNOZX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. RERFX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a Buy and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. MNOZX (306M). RERFX pays higher dividends than MNOZX: RERFX (1.43) vs MNOZX (1.32). MNOZX was incepted earlier than RERFX: MNOZX (7 years) vs RERFX (23 years). MNOZX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: RERFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.39 vs. RERFX (-14.90). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.90 vs. RERFX (15.31).
| MNOZX | RERFX | MNOZX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.52 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.254 | -8.181 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.43 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.39 | -14.90 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.67 | -8.87 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.90 | 15.31 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.97 | - |