Ad is loading...
MNOZX vs RERFX
MNOZX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts MNOZX vs RERFX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$35.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.77M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$57.88
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.73B
MNOZX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOZX vs. RERFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOZX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. MNOZX (358M). RERFX pays higher dividends than MNOZX: RERFX (1.39) vs MNOZX (1.28). MNOZX was incepted earlier than RERFX: MNOZX (7 years) vs RERFX (23 years). MNOZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: RERFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.58 vs. RERFX (-0.03). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. RERFX (28.11).
| MNOZX | RERFX | MNOZX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.52 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.019 | 7.864 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 129B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | -0.03 | -36,405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.93 | 21.48 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | 28.11 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers