Ad is loading...
MNSAF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
TBXXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MNSAF vs TBXXF

Header iconMNSAF vs TBXXF Comparison
Open Charts MNSAF vs TBXXFBanner chart's image
MINEROS SA
Price$0.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
TURMALINA METALS
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.1K
CapitalizationN/A
MNSAF vs TBXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSAF vs. TBXXF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSAF is a Hold and TBXXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MNSAF: $0.95 vs. TBXXF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: MNSAF and TBXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSAF: 71% vs. TBXXF: 6%
Market capitalization -- MNSAF: $142.57M vs. TBXXF: $13.83M
MNSAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $142.57M. TBXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than TBXXF.

Price Growth

MNSAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($143M) has a higher market cap than TBXXF($13.8M). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 151.242 vs. TBXXF (-78.166). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.5M vs. TBXXF (-4.46M). TBXXF has more cash in the bank: 3.2M vs. MNSAF (170K). MNSAF has higher revenues than TBXXF: MNSAF (522M) vs TBXXF (0).
MNSAFTBXXFMNSAF / TBXXF
Capitalization143M13.8M1,036%
EBITDA62.5M-4.46M-1,403%
Gain YTD151.242-78.166-193%
P/E Ratio14.58N/A-
Revenue522M0-
Total Cash170K3.2M5%
Total Debt46.9MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LI22.720.49
+2.20%
Li Auto
WRN1.290.02
+1.57%
Western Copper and Gold Corp
SWAG1.13N/A
N/A
Stran & Company
BLMN13.20-0.23
-1.71%
Bloomin' Brands
DLO9.89-0.31
-3.04%
DLocal Limited

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSAF has been loosely correlated with PPTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSAF jumps, then PPTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
N/A
PPTA - MNSAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+16.48%
GNYPF - MNSAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLGDF - MNSAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
TDRRF - MNSAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
RDYFF - MNSAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBXXF and VAUCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBXXF and VAUCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBXXF
1D Price
Change %
TBXXF100%
-14.38%
VAUCF - TBXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.19%
MNSAF - TBXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFPM - TBXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
TAJIF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMGGF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
More