MNSB
Price
$18.20
Change
-$1.71 (-8.59%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
39 days until earnings call
PROV
Price
$16.31
Change
-$0.19 (-1.15%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MNSB vs PROV

Header iconMNSB vs PROV Comparison
Open Charts MNSB vs PROVBanner chart's image
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$18.20
Change-$1.71 (-8.59%)
Volume$11.36K
CapitalizationN/A
Provident Financial Holdings
Price$16.31
Change-$0.19 (-1.15%)
Volume$36.28K
CapitalizationN/A
MNSB vs PROV Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNSB vs. PROV commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSB is a Hold and PROV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MNSB: $18.20 vs. PROV: $16.31)
Brand notoriety: MNSB and PROV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNSB: 117% vs. PROV: 404%
Market capitalization -- MNSB: $136.83M vs. PROV: $92.68M
MNSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $136.83M. PROV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePROV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PROV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSB is a better buy in the long-term than PROV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PROV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROV is a better buy in the short-term than MNSB.

Price Growth

MNSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.95% price change this week, while PROV (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

PROV is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSB($137M) has a higher market cap than PROV($92.7M). PROV has higher P/E ratio than MNSB: PROV (12.10) vs MNSB (5.53). PROV YTD gains are higher at: 34.671 vs. MNSB (-24.920). MNSB has less debt than PROV: MNSB (72.6M) vs PROV (242M). MNSB has higher revenues than PROV: MNSB (79.6M) vs PROV (40.3M).
MNSBPROVMNSB / PROV
Capitalization137M92.7M148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-24.92034.671-72%
P/E Ratio5.5312.1046%
Revenue79.6M40.3M198%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt72.6M242M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNSB vs PROV: Fundamental Ratings
MNSB
PROV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5060
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNSB's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (40) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's SMR Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.

PROV's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PROV’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PROV (25) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to PROV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSBPROV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MNSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVCX39.27N/A
N/A
Delaware Opportunity C
RGGKX31.81N/A
N/A
Victory RS Global R
FIQAX16.04-0.32
-1.96%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Z
AEDRX31.43-0.69
-2.15%
Invesco EQV European Equity R
COMSX39.76-1.26
-3.07%
DWS Communications S

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with PPBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then PPBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
-8.59%
PPBI - MNSB
54%
Loosely correlated
-6.21%
SBCF - MNSB
53%
Loosely correlated
-5.53%
ABCB - MNSB
52%
Loosely correlated
-5.02%
TFSL - MNSB
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.39%
EGBN - MNSB
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.12%
More

PROV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PROV and RNST have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROV and RNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROV
1D Price
Change %
PROV100%
-1.15%
RNST - PROV
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.39%
MNSB - PROV
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.59%
FFIC - PROV
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.74%
FSBC - PROV
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
FUNC - PROV
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
More