MNSB vs PWOD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNSB is a Hold and PWOD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNSB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWOD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MNSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PWOD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWOD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PWOD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MNSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.03% price change this week, while PWOD (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNSB is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
PWOD is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+3.09% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| MNSB | PWOD | MNSB / PWOD | |
| Capitalization | 137M | 146M | 94% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.956 | -12.200 | 114% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.53 | 8.03 | 69% |
| Revenue | 79.6M | 63.3M | 126% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 72.6M | 397M | 18% |
MNSB | PWOD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNSB's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWOD (61). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWOD’s over the last 12 months.
PWOD's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (93). This means that PWOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.
PWOD's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (19). This means that PWOD’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.
PWOD's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (74). This means that PWOD’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.
MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (13). This means that MNSB’s stock grew similarly to PWOD’s over the last 12 months.
| MNSB | PWOD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLOAX | 7.48 | 0.02 | +0.27% |
| Cohen & Steers Future of Energy A | |||
| SUGAX | 11.98 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Pioneer Global Growth A | |||
| GICAX | 13.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts A | |||
| CSMCX | 40.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Congress Small Cap Growth Institutional | |||
| DAABX | 16.61 | -0.16 | -0.95% |
| DFA US Sustainability Targeted Val Instl | |||
MNSB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNSB | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| SBCF - MNSB | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| PPBI - MNSB | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| PWOD - MNSB | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| VBTX - MNSB | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| HOPE - MNSB | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
PWOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWOD has been loosely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWOD jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWOD | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| CAC - PWOD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| UVSP - PWOD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| SFNC - PWOD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SHBI - PWOD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FIBK - PWOD | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||