Advertisement
MOD vs OEC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOD is a Buy and OEC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MOD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOEC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MOD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OEC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MOD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OEC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MOD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- OEC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MOD (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -11.81% price change this week, while OEC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
MOD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
OEC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.74% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.62% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| MOD | OEC | MOD / OEC | |
| Capitalization | 4.9B | 1.36B | 360% |
| EBITDA | 296M | 327M | 91% |
| Gain YTD | -22.065 | -30.859 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.10 | 13.52 | 163% |
| Revenue | 2.42B | 1.89B | 128% |
| Total Cash | 150M | 37.5M | 400% |
| Total Debt | 333M | 927M | 36% |
MOD | OEC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OEC's Valuation (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as MOD (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew similarly to MOD’s over the last 12 months.
MOD's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OEC (85) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OEC’s over the last 12 months.
MOD's SMR Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OEC (81) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OEC’s over the last 12 months.
MOD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OEC (88) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than OEC’s over the last 12 months.
OEC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOD (69) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that OEC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOD’s over the last 12 months.
| MOD | OEC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JANW | 33.91 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | |||
| NACP | 41.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empwrmt ETF | |||
| XDJL | 35.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd ETF Jul | |||
| HTRB | 33.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| BKCI | 50.45 | -0.12 | -0.23% |
| BNY Mellon Concentrated Internatnl ETF | |||
MOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOD has been loosely correlated with ALSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOD jumps, then ALSN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOD | 100% | -3.12% | ||
| ALSN - MOD | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PHIN - MOD | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| HYLN - MOD | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BWA - MOD | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| DAN - MOD | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OEC has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OEC jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEC | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| CBT - OEC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| AVNT - OEC | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ECVT - OEC | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CC - OEC | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SCL - OEC | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||