MODL vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MODL is a Buy and SNPS is a Sell.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MODL | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IHGIX | 37.42 | -0.19 | -0.51% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth A | |||
| BMSSX | 15.98 | -0.16 | -0.99% |
| MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R2 | |||
| JABZX | 10.56 | -0.15 | -1.40% |
| JHancock Global Environmental Opps A | |||
| WEGRX | 13.34 | -0.19 | -1.40% |
| Allspring Emerging Growth R6 | |||
| TSNRX | 17.74 | -0.49 | -2.69% |
| Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr R6 | |||
MODL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MODL has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MODL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MODL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MODL | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| MSFT - MODL | 68% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| CDNS - MODL | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - MODL | 66% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| AMZN - MODL | 66% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| GOOG - MODL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -5.03% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 86% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| INTU - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||